brooktrails/pr-reviewer
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

doc: add module docstring and documentation to reviewer.py #8

Merged
rcsheets merged 1 commit from doc/reviewer-docstrings into main 2026-03-20 22:15:24 +00:00
Conversation 1 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +94 -15
rcsheets commented 2026-03-20 22:14:57 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Explains the two-tier review system, backend options, prompt tuning,
size limits, data classes, and the message assembly pipeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

Explains the two-tier review system, backend options, prompt tuning, size limits, data classes, and the message assembly pipeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Explains the two-tier review system, backend options, prompt tuning,
size limits, data classes, and the message assembly pipeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
pr-reviewer-bot commented 2026-03-20 22:15:05 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Automated review by pr-reviewer v0.10.0 | Safety Check | anthropic | tracking id r-bdc6e3-8d37b6

Status: ✅ Completed

This PR adds comprehensive documentation and module docstrings to the reviewer.py file. I've reviewed the diff for any obvious issues:

The changes are purely additive documentation - no logic changes, no new dependencies, no configuration modifications. The docstrings accurately describe the existing code structure and behavior. The version reference to "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" appears to be a placeholder/example rather than an actual API call, and the "Claude Opus 4.6" co-author attribution seems to be a documentation reference rather than any security concern.

Verdict: LGTM

*Automated review by [pr-reviewer](https://git.brooktrails.org/brooktrails/pr-reviewer) v0.10.0 | Safety Check | anthropic | tracking id `r-bdc6e3-8d37b6`* **Status:** ✅ Completed --- This PR adds comprehensive documentation and module docstrings to the reviewer.py file. I've reviewed the diff for any obvious issues: The changes are purely additive documentation - no logic changes, no new dependencies, no configuration modifications. The docstrings accurately describe the existing code structure and behavior. The version reference to "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" appears to be a placeholder/example rather than an actual API call, and the "Claude Opus 4.6" co-author attribution seems to be a documentation reference rather than any security concern. **Verdict: LGTM**
rcsheets deleted branch doc/reviewer-docstrings 2026-03-20 22:15:25 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
brooktrails/pr-reviewer!8
No description provided.